BOMBSHELL: Director General of World Health Organization Admits 70% of Budget Comes With Strings Attached from Donors
Control the Pocketbook Of an Organization & You Control the Agenda
Transcript: Margaret Chan: If I tell you [we] as an organization, only 30% of my budget is predictable funds. Other 70%, I have to take a hat and go around the world to beg for money, and when they give us the money, they are highly linked to their preferences: what they like.
This disclosure would likely be obvious news to anyone who has been paying attention. What is extraordinary is that it is being admitted out loud and that few seem to notice or care. The corruption has become so saturating that it is now viewed as mundane and expected—few even bat an eyelash anymore.
So, who funds the WHO and uses those funds to control it? People like this guy:
Who controls the media? This guy:
Do you trust this guy?
Here is what the Croatian MEP had to say about the World Health Organization—It would be healthier for humanity to sign agreement with the Colombian drug cartels:
More information on how the love of money can get many people to do many unsavory things they would not normally do: https://tritorch.com/legion
Its website shows up to 90% of the budget:
The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the 2023 IHR and 2024 International PLANdemc Treaty: we’ve got until November 2023 for Congress to repeal IHR modifications!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
Still, the budget doesn't matter: the masons created the UN, and they control all agencies, including the WHO.
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
I don’t see how this is surprising. Countries and donors have vested interests in certain realities becoming tangible. For countries, this is to benefit their people. For donors, this is often to benefit their investments or philanthropy.
Therefore those donor countries, or individuals, utilize their resources (financial and other) to make those interests reality. This is not new, novel, or about to ever change.
Take for example the president of the U.S.: when Trump was in office, he wielded the threat of financial string pulling against the WHO in an effort to get what he felt was more fair for the U.S. He did this with a number of governing global bodies; it is partly what made him so popular. He has been no different than any previous president who has utilized the U.S.‘a significant financial advantage on the global economic stage to try and influence global politics/global governance.
Ultimately, the problem here has become the desired goals of the individual members of the WHO, not the way in which their funding comes with strings from other countries. If the WHO got money from member countries and donors without strings attached, they would be a global governance body that taxed countries without representing the people of said countries (taxation without representation and therefore, legitimately, theft).
Withholding finances to obtain desired outcomes can be an effective political strategy for a short period of time. But there are only two ways to get long term desired results for global power groups: 1) get effective representation in said global power groups. 2) displace said global power groups
So in other words, stop complaining about what is definitively going to happen, and start working to be the one who pulls the strings.